Reporting Real Estate Losses the WRONG Way Causes IRS Audits

One of the many challenges for real estate investors in 2008 was the IRS’s ill-timed audit offensive against anyone with real estate losses. Early in 2008, we started getting rumors of audit teams targeting real estate investors who reported losses from real estate. They started in California, but then when they saw just how many returns they could extract gold from, they expanded the program.
If you had real estate investments that had losses in 2008, you’re now left with the question of how you’re going to report that loss when you file your tax returns. And more importantly, how you can do it to avoid the greatest possibility of IRS wrath.
If you make less than $100,000, you’re pretty clear. You can deduct up to $25,000 in losses against your other income. If you make more than $150,000, you can’t deduct anything. Between $100,000 and $150,000, the amount of loss phases out.
I’ve seen lots of people try things that just aren’t going to work to get around that rule. There is only one legal way. First, though, here are the things I’ve seen people do wrong:
Disregard the income limitation and take the deduction anyway. Ignorance isn’t bliss here. Your return is almost guaranteed to be audited.
Move the real estate loss over to a Schedule C (Sole Proprietorship). In some cases, real estate investments are considered trade or business, not real estate investing, but only in rare,e extreme cases.
Run the real estate loss through a business return and net against active income. Can’t do that - passive is passive.
Claim real estate professional status incorrectly.
This last one leads to the one way you CAN take the write off. If you are a real estate professional, working more hours in real estate activities than in any other acitvity and a minimum of 750 hours per year. PLUS you need to materially participate in the management of the properties to the tune of 500 hours per property. Yes, that’s right - 500 hours PER property, unless you make an election to aggregate the property. And I’ve seen about 1 out of 20 people have the proper aggregation election on their return.
There are dozens of other ways that this can go wrong - for example, holding your property in a Limited Partnership means the Real Estate Professional designation won’t help you.
If you’re facing real estate losses and want to know how to LEGALLY write them off, then you want to make sure that the IRS Survival Guide for Real Estate Professionals with Real Estate Investments is in your library.
Trackback URL for this post:
- Diane Kennedy's blog
- Sign in to post comments
- Email this page
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Quick question about aggregation: I did an aggregation election for 2007, and bought another property in 2008. Do I need to file another aggregation election when I do my 2008 taxes?
Also, is there any way to e-file if I make an aggregation election? I paper-filed for 2007, what a pain.
Thanks!
_
Charlie
Once you’ve done the aggregation, it’s done. HOWEVER, there is nothing that says you can’t do a 2nd one. It’s so important that I think I would just do it again.
I think we’ll see some improvements this year for e-filing. They didn’t allow footnotes before and they say they will be now. (I haven’t tested it yet though)
…This last one leads to the one way you CAN take the write off. If you are a real estate professional, working more hours in real estate activities than in any other acitvity and a minimum of 750 hours per year.
Currently my husband and I are employees in Corporate America with six rental properties that we manage in our spare time protected via an LLC. We show losses every year on the rentals but are carrying forward our losses since we make over $150,000. Even if I quit Corp America and became a real estate professional, do I understand correctly, that we would still not be able pass the losses through agaist his income since his income alone would qualify for AMT status?
Thanks!