Sign In
 
 

Looks Like the "iTunes Tax" Is About To Hit All Of Us

Diane Kennedy's picture
Keywords:

Popularly called the iTunes tax, an unpopular sales tax on digital downloads is required to be paid currently in 27 states and the District of Columbia. Add this to the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SST) and the ‘Internet Tax’ that Megan and I blogged about last week and we’re all about to get hit with a lot more tax than we’re expecting.

Currently, Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia impose such taxes, according to research by CNET News.com, Electronic Arts, and the California State Board of Equalization, which sets the state’s tax rules. There is even confusion among these authorities as to what exactly is included in the ‘digital download’ definition.

Currently, we use the “origin” basis for sales. In other words, you pay tax based on where the seller has nexus, not where the buyer is located. If you have a digital product that you sell over the Internet, you have a lot of freedom on where you can set nexus. Oregon (with no sales tax) would look pretty compelling, but don’t forget they have a pretty steep income tax. So, you’re going to have to weigh the best options for where to establish nexus. And if SST prevails over the Internet Tax, we’ll have destination-based nexus and it’ll all be moot.

Keep your tax plans flexible. We’re in for a bumpy ride.

TrackBack

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.taxloopholes.com/connect/trackback/1488

Let’s see. If it ends up being seller based, then companies will move to states where it is cheapest to do business.

If it ends up being destination based, then companies will have added costs to keep track of a myriad of local and state sales tax rules. Unless there is an efficient infrastructure put in place for businesses (he-he-he), it seems like that could discourage some companies from selling in states where they don’t do enough business to justify the administration and extra taxes that could be imposed at the business level.

As always, government relies on businesses to do their tax collecting. Talk about biting the hand…

Syndicate content